Vicars ban wedding photographers in Church

I’ve come to the conclusion that The Church of England and Amy Winehouse have a lot in common with one another – both have the potential to change the world, yet both are hell bent on destroying themselves.

Less than 12 months ago the Archbishop of Canterbury passed a new ruling called the “Marriage Measures” it was designed to bring Church Marriages into the 21st Centuries. In brief, the couple no longer had to show a direct connection with a specific church or parish. At last the penny had dropped that couples wanted to marry in pretty churches and so the “Idyllic Churches”  were freed to offer their marriage services to all couples. Well done I hear you cry, at last. The Church had seen the writing on the wall and decided to compete with the registry office. One budding Vicar has even started marketing his church on Ebay, I like that… no its not disrespectful, its pragmatic.

Image-0

However there seems to be a sinister threat to the Archbishop of Canterbury’s hopes for attracting more couples to church for their weddings. There is an alarming trend which could become the dominant view in church unless halted very soon. Worse still it is being implemented as swiftly and efficiently as could only be achieved in a dictatorship.

A bride stands at the altar speaking the most important words of her life so far, “I do”, and whilst she will have her personal memory, she has been banned from having any wedding photographs. With alarming regularity, unswerving authority and without appeal, Church Vicars are saying “No” to wedding photography during the marriage service.

To make matters worse the couple often only find out at the rehearsal. The question then is who do you speak to?  What do you do? The Vicar is the face of the church and often an impassable brick wall. I have seen a Vicar  leave the groom standing at the Altar, take the bride to one side and tell her in no uncertain terms, “No photography in my church”.

Before I say anything I ought to share my credentials. I may be an award winning photographer, and I am… But I was also a Baptist Minister (Vicar) for ten years and have a degree in Theology (The study of God) from Oxford University and in those years I married dozens of couples and managed many wedding photographers.

image-3

So why are Vicars banning wedding photography in church?

Well it seems for three reasons:

1.     The bad behaviour of photographers

2.     Photography disrupts the service

3.     Photography during a wedding service is simply irrelevant.

“We all encounter bad behaviour in life,

but we don’t focus on it.”

It is true, some wedding photographers can behave badly, climbing over the pews, pointing a lens in the Bride’s face as she say “I do”.  One wedding photographer I heard of, stopped the service because his camera malfunctioned and he wanted the minister to do it over again for his backup camera.

So I do sympathise with vicars because some photographers behave badly. But the old saying about “throwing the baby out with the bathwater” springs to mind.

In the Bible, there was a time when the Apostle Peter was fed up with the way he was being treated and he asked Jesus, “How many times should I forgive, seven times.” His reply stunned Peter, seventy times seven, In other words never stop forgiving.

My Policy: Is to agree with the Vicar where Elise my partner will stand at the front of the church and where I will stand at the rear of the church. Without exception Elise never moves from her position unless invited to by the Vicar and I only move if its been agreed beforehand.

212__D300616 copy

“When disruptions happen,

professionals adapt and move on.”

It was my first service in my first church and I announced the wrong song. The church sang one song the organist played another. I was really annoyed, I wasn’t sure what to do, and I felt everything went down hill from that point. An elder member of the congregation said to me “that was fun, at least it made everyone think about what they were singing.”

A decade later, in the middle of my sermon a toddler walks up to the platform and grabs my leg. The congregation found this disruption incredible funny. So what did I do? Get annoyed. No. I picked up the toddler and quoted Jesus’ words “The Kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these”. Then I used the child’s innocent action to explain the kind of life God is looking for from us adults.

Disruption happens, and you can’t always prevent it. However Vicars are trained professionals and are able to adapt and move on. They choose how to respond to disruptions, either use it for good, or become frustrated by it, either way it’s their choice.

The biggest disruption caused by wedding photographers is undoubtedly the use of flash. The flash on your compact camera is bad enough, but a professional flash could be a hundred times more powerful. It can distract the Vicar, the couple, even the whole congregation if it goes off thirty or forty times during a service.

Our Policy: Has been to invest in high speed cameras. Each of our cameras and lens costs in excess of £5,000 but the benefit is 60, 70, 100 photographs during the service virtually silently and without flash. Likewise, we never use continuous shooting. We take single key photographs of expressions, the rings going on, precious moments. Most photographs are taken during hymns or as the congregation stands or sits so no one hears us.

“A picture paints a thousand words,

and God knows that….”

292__D301914

I always loved the fact that Jesus did His first miracle at a wedding. Kind of tells you how important your marriage is to God, doesn’t it.

Now the argument goes, we never used to have photography in church, so we don’t need it now and anyway they didn’t have photographs in Jesus’ day.

Well the world moves on as the Archbishop of Canterbury knows. Today we live in a world where photographs are a central part of our world; consider TV, Web, Facebook, all now part of daily life, all photographically centered. Let’s face it Jesus preached to thousands without a P.A. system, yet you won’t find a church these days without one, or without central heating or electric come to that! Technology simply opens up opportunities and this is a wonderful opportunity for the church to create a memory that will matter the most in a couple’s life.

I always think its tragic when you look through a wedding album and see the bride enter the church, turn the page and everyone is throwing confetti. Where’s the most important moment of this couples life together? Where is the history of the moment, the beauty of the kiss, the joy, the excitement…?

Does God approve of wedding photography? I never speak on behalf of God because He can speak for himself. Just consider that in over 90% of Jesus’ teaching he “painted pictures” in words for the people, they’re called parables. For the first 1600 years the church used “The Stations of the Cross”, icon-pictures of the 12 most important aspects of Jesus’ life to teach their congregations the truths of the Bible. What lives on in the world’s consciousness about Jesus are His parables like the Good Samaritan or the Lost Sheep, truth in pictures. What better truth, than the love of two people, pictured forever.

When a couple are going through hard times, they will often get out their wedding album to remember that precious day. Maybe its to help remind them of why they got married, or the vows they made to each other, or their commitment…  whatever the reason, what will their wedding album say when the page where they were supposed to say “I do” is blank?

This years 35% of the church weddings we were booked to photograph have either changed church venues or moved to hotels because Vicars banned wedding photography… how sad is that… how Amy Winehouse is that?

297__D3X8883

My Advice to Couples:

  • Ask the Vicar at your first meeting for the church’s guidelines on photography.
  • Book a full-time professional wedding photographer who is a member of an International Association like the MPA or BIPP. This will mean that they have to abide by a certain code of conduct.
  • Remember there are hundreds of cheap weekend warriors who have bought cheap digital cameras and now call themselves wedding photographers. You are more likely to run into problems with these photographers.
  • Book your wedding photographer as early as possible and work out where they want to stand in the church, then communicate that to the vicar in person. Telephones and emails are not good ways to communicate issues that affect the service, so meet the vicar at the church and show him where your wedding photographer will stand.
  • Book a wedding photographer who doesn’t need to rely on flash especially during the wedding service
  • Get your wedding photographer to write, telephone or meet the Vicar to confirm that they won’t move during the service, and they will not use continuous shooting and that they will respect the solemnity of the service.
  • If having done everything possible to way lay the fears of the Vicar and yet (s)he refuse to have wedding photography then you can contact the Bishop. If you Google the Parish name where you are getting married the Bishop for that Parish should come up, call him/her and ask for their help, they are usually very helpful. Alternatively you can contact Emily Shepherd, Director of Communications at email: eshepherd@diocant.org

My Advice to Vicars:

  • Set a written church policy and give  it to couples and their wedding photographers at the very first meeting.
  • A church’s guidelines could require the use of a qualified wedding photographers who belongs to an accredited association like the MPA or BIPP.
  • If the wedding photographer behaves badly report him/her to their Professional Body, who will take action. Just a thought, forgiveness allows the good guys to carry on with your trust; just-consequences is what is due to badly behaved wedding photographers which should come through their professional body (Their god, “Vengeance is mine says the Lord”)

298__D3X8886

You can either leave your experiences here or go to http://www.imaginethat.uk.net/blog/?p=327


(polls)

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • Add to favorites
  • MySpace
  • RSS
  • Twitter

4 comments to Vicars ban wedding photographers in Church

  • [...] That Studios – Portrait & Wedding Photographers in the [...]

  • As a long-time amateur who wants to turn pro, but currently can’t afford to buy a £5000 camera, I have had the pleasure of photographing two civil ceremonies. I appreciate that the subject of this discussion is The Church, but nevertheless the same principles apply. The photographer must act in a respectful manner, having regard to the sanctity of the occasion and the location.

    Whenever I take photographs at an indoor location, e.g. a stately home, club, or whatever, I always endeavour to enquire about the venue’s photography policy, and where professionals are concerned (registrar / clergy at weddings or similar events, or professional bands) I have checked with them as well. In all instances, I have chosen to abide by any restrictions.

    On the first wedding, I didn’t have the opportunity to discuss this with the registrar; I was a guest, and was asked to step in by the groom when the pro didn’t show. The registrar told me where to stand, and asked me not to use flash. I knew my camera, so set the appropriate white balance (tungsten) and a high ISO. I would point out that I had no complaints from the registrar.

    The second wedding was in a small register office, and there really was only one place to stand, although a second photographer could have stood at the back. Again, the rule was ‘no flash’.

    Perhaps what vicars should do – which would help wedding photographers – is to ban guests from taking pictures during the service. Guests’ cameras are more likely to fire a flash, which can be irritating to other guests as well.

    What really bugs me more than anything though is this: You go to a gig or concert and ask about the rules and are told ‘no way’, yet you are forced to watch the performance through others’ mobile phones & cameras.

    Enough said!

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • You know what… I think it depends on the attitude of the photographer. Jacs and I both photograph at a wedding, we always take the time out to meet with whoever is running the wedding service to be inline with their ruling.

    Whilst I agree that a photograph during the service can be gorgeous (we have many such images), it is not the be-all and end-all of the day.

    I also find that if you abide by their wishes and ask the question of… “what are your rules regarding photography?” That you instantly show you will follow what they request and respect their position. If they say no photography I then say, I fully understand your position on that but wonder if it would be possible to grab a photograph of three things, each ring being placed on the finger and the kiss? Sometimes even with the no-photography rule, they will agree to something far less intrusive. If they say none. I acquiesce and retire gracefully usually the second time we meet, they are more willing to allow the three shots.

    I then ask where they feel I could stand that would be out of their way and cause as little distraction to the couple as possible. I understand that they are making vows, legal, emotional and religeous. Each is a very personal thing to do. Each requires their focus and attention. I get distracted easily so would prefer not to have click click click happening when I did it, I appreciate the position they are in!

    I also think their has been a hiatus of less than professional photographers out there insisting they have the right to do it. Taking shots even if they have been asked not to and subsequently muddying the waters for those of us who are understanding of the actuality of the day, the roles we all have to perform and that we can’t always have our own way!

    A little bit of caution, understanding and sense could get us a lot more opportunities in the long run.

    For me, the question should be… should couples employ part-time photographers to photograph their weddings? A professional full time photographer who understands the full situation is more likely to not upset the clergy and therefore actually get the shot. Once more, peace could be found between the church and the image creator if we work ethically and with understanding.

    Ok, rant over, let’s go make some more Brides and Grooms look amazing!

    Paul and Jacs

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • [...] from taking wedding photographs during a wedding service. I have written a blog on my position at http://www.imaginethat.uk.net/blog/?p=242 [...]

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>